Meet the South African who plays with wild lions!

Kevin Richardson is an autodidact, "The Lion Whisperer", as he is known, learned to handle lions alone.

According to reports, from three years old, he already felt this attraction to wildlife.

In South Africa, Kevin started working at the Lion Park in Johannesburg which handles about 80 lions, working with them for about 11 years. The zoologist avoided traditional methods to train animals ,such as cages and chains, and used other weapons: love, understanding and trust.

Comment bellow!    

AND STAY SUPER!

Read More

HUGE WASPS KILLING PEOPLE

     In China, giant wasps are attacking people and doing many victims. More than 1600 people have been attacked in three months in which 42 people have died 205 were hospitalized.

The Asian wasp known as Giant Hornet,  is the largest in the world.

      The explanation of the recent attacks, would be that with the extinction of certain wasp predators such as certain birds or spiders, linked to climate change as the high abnormal heat in these last months that are the wasps specially nervous.

THE ARM OF ONE OF THE VICTIMS

      They mainly attack people who are running. In group, the wasp is known to be a ruthless hunter, the giant hornet attacks typically large insects like crickets and bees and is able to tear the heads of insects in a few seconds with their massive jaws.

        The venom of the wasp and it's sting are extremely painful, and deaths are usually caused by an allergic reaction to the venom.

Watch this video of a battle between giant hornet bees and european bees

Comment bellow!    

AND STAY SUPER!

Read More

Sewing Machine's Needles: lethal weapons in World War II

You know that old Singer sewing machine that used to be in grandma's house?

Well, the needles of these contraptions have been used as lethal weapons.

       On December 23, 1941, the factory of Singer sewing machines, located in Bristol, England, received a strange request: the largest order of sewing machine needles in the whole story. But they were no ordinary needles.The request was full of specifications and conditions. An executive of Singer, intrigued, asked.

     "We do not know exactly what they want. According to the specifications, it seems that they need needles for another purpose other than sewing machines."
      He was right: the same request had REALLY nothing to do with sewing. To begin with, the request was made by the Research Center of the British  Ministry of War, where they did experiments with chemical and biological weapons.

     Researchers there led by British bacteriologist Paul Fildesy, working with Canadian and American scientists - developed a kind of "non-destructive" weapon. Meaning, not in the sense of big explosions. They wanted a highly lethal weapon to be used in open field against enemy troops, but that would not destroy the location as conventional bombs and mustard gas did.

     The idea was to develop darts with needles – ordered at Singer – with antrax or ricina. The needle had a small compartment with the toxin and it would be sealed with cotton and wax.
To calculate the percentage of hits, tests were conducted on animals. The results impressed:
     90% of enemy soldiers, in horizontal position, and 17% of those in the trench would be hit.

The effects of a dart were fatal.

       If the soldier plucked the needle out after 30 seconds, he would be dead in less than 30 minutes. If the dart was withdrew before 30 seconds after the hit, within five minutes the victim would collapse incapacitated. 
      Despite the proven destructive effectiveness and low production cost, the Ministry of War aborted the project. The justification was that this weapon was ineffective when it came to hitting targets in buildings or vehicles, something that would be no problem with conventional bombs.

Comment bellow!    

AND STAY SUPER!

Read More

Little Koala Bears! So cute *-*

Cute and cuddly! Little Babies of Koala bears at the vet

Read More

The Secret of Friendships that Last

What makes people become friends? And why do some friendships last and others do not?

   An article in  the site Psychology Today gathered some studies that bring good explanations about the topic.

The well practical, main points are listed below:

Conditions to start a friendship

    Besides some basic factors, such as having contact with a person on a regular basis (after all, we have more chances to know someone better and further develop our bond) and having some common interests, these two aspects are important for becoming friends with someone.

1. Willingness to open up  

    According to Beverley Fehr, a researcher at the University of Winnipeg and author of "Friendship Processes" what determines that we move from acquaintances to friends is the willingness to open up and reveal more personal things to each other – and this needs to come from both sides. 

"In the early stages of friendship, this tends to be a gradual process. A person accepts the risk of revealing personal information and 'tests' if the other does the same "she says.

Here, reciprocity is essential for it to work, because it leads to another important condition:

2. Intimacy

According to Fehr's research, people with good friendships involving the same sex have a good understanding of what intimacy involves:

     They know how to open up and express their emotions, know what to say when the friend tells you something and respect the limits - understand, for example, sincerity does not mean talking all that comes to mind, especially with regard to opinions on life and tastes.

Especially because other conditions were pointed out: Acceptance, loyalty and trust. These qualities were considered more important than practical aids such as lending money.

Then, Why do some friendships last and others do not?

Ok, we understand what gives the friendships that initial kick forward. But there is another important factor, discovered by social psychologists Carolyn Weisz and Lisa F. Wood, from University of Puget Sound, in Tacoma, Washington, which is essential to make relationships last:

...The support to our social identity.

   In other words, looking for friends who understand and validate the idea that we have about ourselves and about our role in society or group to which we belong – which can be linked to religion, ethnicity, profession or even participating in some club or subculture.

    To reach this conclusion, they followed a group of college students for years throughout their graduation, asking them to describe levels of proximity, contact, general support and support for social identity that felt about friends.

The conclusion was that all these factors helped to predict whether the friendship would be maintained or not.

     But a single factor can predict who would be elevated to the position of BEST FRIEND: the person in these cases was part of the same group (fraternity, team, etc.) or at least supported and reaffirmed the role of the friend within that group. 

       

    A Christian could have a best friend as someone who had different beliefs, as long as this friend would support his identity as a Christian. And, as we have various roles in life, it is more likely that our best friend is on the role that is most important to us, that best represents our identity or part of it.

Why do we chose friends?

     According to the study, it is related to higher levels of intimacy and understanding also involving increased self-esteem.

This sense of identity even influences the behavior of drug addicts. In another study Weisz concluded that people were more likely to get rid of their addictions after three months when they felt that their social roles and sense of identity conflicted with drug use.

"Our social identities are so important to us that we are willing to stay with people who support our social identity and getting away from those who do not. We can even change friends when the former did not support our current view of ourselves ", states an article of Psychology Today. "Conventional wisdom says that we choose friends because of who they are. But it turns out we really love them because of how they support who we are."

How to maintain a friendship

   According to Debra Oswald, a psychologist at Marquette University (Wisconsin, USA), who studied the relationship between volunteers who were in high school and their best friends, there are four basic behaviors needed to maintain this "link" – that are valid to everyone, no matter if you have 15 or 70 years.

   The first two points are fairly explored so far: take the initiative to open up and supporting our friends. The third point is INTERACTION. No matter if your friend is your neighbor or is living on another continent: you need to be in contact with him, either writing, chatting on the phone, visiting. Fortunately, with the internet, physical proximity has little effect on our ability to maintain a friendship or any type of relationship.

    Finally, it is important to be positive. We need to open ourselves to our friends, but that does not mean it's okay to stay whimpering for hours and only see the negative side of everything.

     Of course, part of being a friend is to help during the hassles of our friend's life but, in the end, the intimacy that makes a friendship thrive must be something nice and do good for both sides.

   I really enjoyed writing his article because it really made me understand why I have lost some great friendships, because some of this conditions were not worked enough by me, or by the people who no longer are important to me as friends.

But not everything is lost, some friends are worth it and some friendships can be repaired.

Comment bellow!    

AND STAY SUPER!

Read More

Sweet Gifts From Mother Earth

Read More

Tennis player killed a bird during Match

This Tennis player happened to hit a bird and killing the poor animal by accident

Read More

FIVE IMPORTANT LESSONS ABOUT PRODUCTIVITY

    After graduating from college in May last year, the Canadian Chris Bailey received two great full-time job offers, but refused them.

    He had a plan and accepting any of these proposals would keep him from putting it into practice.

     During 12 months, Bailey and tested read everything he could find on the subject of productivity, sharing his findings on the site that bears the name of the project: A Year of Productivity.

    His goal was to become as productive as possible - and help people to benefit from his discoveries.

    The experiment earned 197 articles during this period, but he published a summary of the most important lessons learned. Here are five of them:

1 - Learn to choose well your tasks in every area of life

     We may have countless things to do in different areas of life (work, education, health, mind, finances, relationships, etc.), but you must sort these tasks according to their worth in improving each of these areas.

Most of them will only consume your time and energy and will not bring remarkable results at all.

     On the other hand, there are some who alone can give you a tenfold return. Discover which ones are they and focus on them.

2 - The most effective tips are the most clichés

         How cliché is to say that the most important tactics to be productive are eating well, getting enough sleep and exercising?

     But know that no matter how silly they may seem, they have proved the most efficient for Chris Bailey. "I think behind the clichés there is such a powerful truth that people feel compelled to repeat them so often they end up losing their value," he wrote.

     "But as someone who has tested hundreds of techniques to better manage his time, energy and attention in the last decade [because he has been researching the subject thoroughly before starting the project] I can state that:

nothing has contributed more to my productivity than eating well, sleeping enough and doing physical exercise".

3 - The three main ingredients for productivity are time, energy and focus

      Bailey found that no matter which techniques he used, they would always involve better managing one or more of these three factors:

time, energy and focus.For him, these are the three key ingredients for consistent productivity.

      If you have lots of energy and focus, but not to manage your time well, eventually devoting many hours to the wrong tasks you wont get the best results.

If you are good at managing your time and have a lot of energy, but doesn't have enough focus, you will be distracted and procrastinate.

And if you have focus and know how to manage your time, but do not know how to manage your energy, you can waste it on less important things.

Therefore, it is essential to have these three skills.

4 - Working too hard for too long is bad for your productivity

     Working nights in a row and not stopping even to lunch calmly may give the impression that you are doing a lot, but definitely doesn't make you a more productive person in the long run.

     "In an experiment that lasted a month, I alternated between working 90 hours a week and 20 hours the following week.

Then I discovered that the productivity was equal in both, for a simple reason:

when I limited the time I would spend on a task, I forced myself to devote more energy in less time so that I could complete it quickly.

     When had more time to work, I tended to procrastinate more and work on activities that give me less results (as we mentioned in the first item), and thus lose more time"states Bailey.

5 - Keep in mind that being productive has to do with how much you achieve, not how much you generate 

      Be gentle with yourself. When you are too focused on being more productive, it is common to make the mistake of focusing on numbers: 

how many pages or words he wrote and read, how many hours he worked, how many emails answered, how much money earned...

      The problem is that, according to Bailey, "unless you work in a factory, measuring your productivity based only on how much you produce will give you a limited overview of how productive you really are."For example, writing a text of 100 words that efficiently condenses what would be written in 500 does not mean you produced less - means you produced better.Replying 200 emails might give the impression that your morning was a success, but were these messages more important than any other single task you could have done instead? 

     Here comes again the discussion of the value of the tasks, and how they contribute to make you feel satisfied not only at the end of the day, but in the end of the week, month and year. 

    Furthermore, one must keep in mind why one wants to achieve certain goals and not lose sight of that objectives, or else ones job satisfaction goes away and the productivity will lose its meaning.

      Finally, Bailey added another point, to keep motivated, it is still necessary to be kind to yourself.

Being more productive requires a tremendous effort, but pushing yourself too much is unreasonable.

     You are trying to make positive changes in your life, then it is important to maintain a positive attitude toward yourself.

STAY SUPER!

Read More